Join 250+ developers community with 24/7 support.

Turn AI code into
production 2x faster

The agentic coding environment for people who care about quality.If AIs can write code 100× faster, why aren't teams shipping 100× faster?

Or just run

Code Walkthrough

1 / 18
UnifiedAnalyticsManager.swift+22-10
468 // MARK: - Subscription analytics
469
470 func trackSubscriptionRestored(productId: String) {
471 analytics.log("subscription_restored", ["product_id": productId])
472 }Now
9 unchanged lines · Lines 472–480 · Hide
480 // Purchase + restore now carry language context for cohorting.
484 func trackSubscriptionPurchased(productId: String, price: Decimal, currency: String) {
485 analytics.log("subscription_purchased", [
486 "product_id": productId,
487 "price": price,
488 "currency": currency
484 func trackSubscriptionPurchased(
485 productId: String,
486 price: Decimal,
487 currency: String,
488 targetLanguage: String,
489 supportLanguage: String
490 ) {
491 analytics.log("subscription_purchased", [
492 "product_id": productId,
493 "price": price,
494 "currency": currency,
495 "target_language": targetLanguage,
496 "support_language": supportLanguage
497 ])
498 }
502 func trackSubscriptionRestored(productId: String, targetLanguage: String, supportLanguage: String) {
503 analytics.log("subscription_restored", [
504 "product_id": productId,
505 "target_language": targetLanguage,
506 "support_language": supportLanguage
507 ])
508 }

Use cases

Use Command Center to plan and execute complex engineering tasks—from multi-agent workflows to guided walkthroughs and pre-merge refactors.

Run your agents
in one workflow

Use Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other agents without jumping between tools.

Workspace

Claude CodeActive
CodexReady
OpenCodeReady
CursorReady

One session · every agent

I've basically stopped using terminal Claude and VSCode in favor of Command Center
Leah McKelvey
Leah McKelvey

Senior Software Engineer, Veridian

Understand large
AI changes

Turn huge diffs into guided walkthroughs you can actually follow.

1
2
3
4

Walkthrough

Step 1 of 4

Session bootstrap

How the app starts

Progress25%
With Command Center walkthroughs, I can get through a 400 line diff in under half the time
Kumar Prateek
Kumar Prateek

Platform Engineer, Sumo Logic

Refactor before merge

Catch maintainability issues, clean up AI slop, and ship production-ready code.

Pre-merge review

0/3 fixed

Maintainability

Extract duplicate setup

Security

Move secret to env

Readability

Split 180-line handler

The refactorings give your LLM taste. I’ve never seen an LLM write code this good before.
Doug Slater
Doug Slater

Staff Software Engineer, Climavision

AI coding involvesmany steps.

Most of them are broken.

Codex CLIClaude Code
✓ Done! I just edited 50 files
Two buttons meme: "Ship and hope for the best" vs "Read 50 files of agent edits"

Without Command Center

The Old Way

  1. Plan and prompt

    Coding agents can generate a huge change in minutes — Auth, APIs, UI, tests. Getting the code written is the easy part. The hard part is everything that comes after.

    Generated from 1 prompt8.4s
    +10,482 lines
    Reviewed
    0 / 10,482
    1prompt10,482lines0reviewed
  2. Juggle or wait

    While one agent works, you open another. Tabs multiply. You lose the plot of what each one changed, and half your day disappears into juggling.

    3 agents active~45m context-switching
    ClaudeRunning2m 14s
    </>CodexThinking0m 45s
    CursorGenerating1m 02s
    3agents6tabs45mswitching
  3. Run it and read it

    You get a PR with hundreds of files and thousands of lines. Alphabetical order. No story. You either skim and hope — or spend hours figuring out where to start.

    feature/auth-system✕ Build failed
    +10,482−4,021247 files
    Msrc/app/agent.ts+312−47
    Msrc/core/planner.ts+201−89
    Msrc/auth/session.ts+144−12
    + 244 more files…
    247files4failed builds17warnings
  4. Revise and refactor

    Duplication, brittle abstractions, secrets in the wrong place. You either polish for days — or ship something your team can’t maintain.

    Changes requested44 commentsround 6
    maintDownload button duplicated in two places — share one componentweb/Download.tsx
    maintLLM provider hard-coded — move it to configcore/provider.ts
    secAPI key committed in source — pull from envcore/provider.ts
    maintAssumes github.com — breaks on GitLab / self-hostedgit/remote.ts
    read140-line function — split so a human can review itcore/planner.ts
    bugNull deref on token-refresh raceauth/session.ts
    + 38 more — most of them aren't bugs.
    44comments36maintainability8bugs
  5. Ship it

    After enough waiting, staring, and cleanup, the change lands. AI made writing faster. Review and release still took forever.

    feature/auth-systemfinally merged
    Tests passingafter 4 attempts
    PR approvedround 6 of 6
    Deployed to productiondeadline missed
    1deadline missed5review rounds1hotfix queued

With Command Center

The New Way

Same agents. One workspace. The painful parts of AI coding, solved.

  1. Plan and prompt

    Same agents

    Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and more — in one workspace. Nothing to migrate. You prompt the same way you always have.

    Choose your agentsame as always
    ClaudeCodexCursor
    3agents1workflow0lock-in
  2. Work in parallel

    One keystroke

    Running agents on different tasks? Switch workspaces with a keystroke instead of juggling tabs and losing context.

  3. Clean up AI slop

    Refactoring agent

    A refactoring agent finds duplication, brittle design, and maintainability issues a quick skim never catches — before you merge.

    Refactoring agentall resolved
    Duplicate component extracted
    Provider moved to config
    Secret pulled from env
    Remote made host-agnostic
    Long function split & named
    44resolved0open1pass
  4. Read the diff in order

    Walkthroughs

    Instead of alphabetical file lists, walkthroughs guide you through changes in logical order. A 2000-line PR becomes arrow keys — read the code, not a summary.

  5. Fix as you read

    Feedback agents

    Spot something wrong? Tell the AI right away. Want a clean context for a small tweak? Spin up a fresh agent for that note with one keypress — no more polluted chats.

  6. Ship it

    Done

    You’ve read it, cleaned it, and fixed what mattered. Commit and open the PR — quality held up without sacrificing how fast the AI wrote it.

Your agent just shipped 50 files. How are you going to read them?

Detecting your platform…

Join 250+ developers for product questions, feedback, and new ideas. [Join Discord]

“CommandCenter was a huge help understanding a big change to my codebase”

Hina Nakahira

Hina Nakahira

Co-founder, Romanark

Questions, answered

Command Center runs locally and does not send your code to our servers. If you use our free Gemini credits, your AI requests pass through our servers but are not retained. Bring your own key or subscription and everything stays private.

Basically nothing. It is built for a wide range of developer environments and skill levels, and ships with both git and a modified version of OpenCode — so you can start building even on a completely unconfigured Windows box. It optionally uses your own coding agent.

Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode. It also works with the deprecated Gemini CLI, and ships its own version of OpenCode (dubbed CC Basic) so you can start right away.

There's a free tier to get started, with limits on walkthroughs, refactoring, and the number of simultaneous workspaces. Paid plans — Starter ($9/mo) and Pro ($19/mo) — unlock higher limits. See the pricing page for the full breakdown.

To get your Command Center online, sign in with Google or GitHub. We use the name and email address associated with your chosen account only to create your Command Center account, authenticate you, and connect your device.

Authentication occurs through your chosen provider's authorization flow, and Command Center never receives your Google or GitHub password. We do not sell this information or use it for advertising.

Glad you asked — here is an explainer we did: click here.

Hiring

Engineer, Future of Software

We're building a team of masterminds — people who understand software so deeply they can keep inventing what comes next. Evidence of that insight can take any form. There aren't many of you. We want to meet you.

Join us